We still have a very exciting horse race to consider on Saturday, however. In all honesty, I can find no reason to question Curlin’s credentials, and I think his morning line price of 6-5 might represent some small measure of value should that price hold up at post time on Saturday. James Quinn has one of his typically interesting pieces up on drf.com titled “Why Curlin Won’t Win”. I happen to disagree with his anti-Curlin arguments, but be that as it may, is there anything on the karma scale that should insure a Curlin victory more than a title like “Why Curlin Won’t Win”?
I digress. Back to the
One horse that won’t be on my tickets is Hard Spun. If he wins, I will lose.
Hard Spun is an easy horse to root for. He has a lot of octane, gets great pace figures, was victimized by what I thought was a premature move in the Preakness, has a great guy for a trainer and figures to get a slower early pace than in either the Preakness or Derby. If I owned Hard Spun, however, and was also an omnipotent racing god who could run against these same six horses at any distance I chose, I doubt that a mile and a half would make my top-10 list. He has lost ground in the stretch in each of his last three dirt races -- all at shorter distances. Some horses have just one speed that they run in early (which could mean that the “move” into Flying First Class and Xchanger wasn’t Mario Pino’s fault), but even if that’s not the case with Hard Spun, I have serious reservations that a mile and a half is a distance with which he will thrive. I know his dam won a stakes at that distance, but I would rather trust his past history rather than a guess about potential, and to me, his running lines are screaming out “miler”-- at least with respect to a dirt surface. He reminds me a little bit of Cherokee Run who I bet in the
Jazil’s name has come up a fair amount in the lead-in to this year’s
Slew’s Tizzy, I feel, is too slow to win this and will be used up dancing with Hard Spun in the early stages. C P West is another late addition to the field (something I’m never keen on as a handicapper) and strikes me as perhaps a somewhat less talented version of Hard Spun. Tiago has seemingly improved since blinkers were removed and may be a nice, longer-priced alternative to horses like Hard Spun and Rags to Riches underneath Curlin. It seems a pretty safe bet that he will get the distance, though being a half-brother to Giacomo gives him a bit of cachet that could well serve to hurt his price.
That leaves Imawildandcrazyguy, whose morning line price of 20-1 is twice that of Tiago, despite the fact that Imawildandcrazyguy defeated him in the
“Ha! This fool likes that clunk-up closer that will be lucky to run fourth,” you say.
Maybe. But we ARE talking about a 20-1 shot here, and let’s stop for a moment to consider this year’s
The interior fractions for this year’s
20th (trailing by 24 lengths at first call)
20th (trailing by 18 at second call)
16th (by 8 ¾ at third call)
11th (by 11 lengths at stretch call)
4th (beaten 8 ½ lengths at finish)
Now let’s go back to the 2006
The interior fractions for 2006
20th (trailing by 14 lengths at first call)
20th (trailing by 17 at second call)
17th (by 8 ¾ at third call)
6th (by 7 lengths at stretch call)
4th (beaten 9 ½ lengths at finish)
Not an exact match, mind you, but pretty darned similar. I am going to make a small win bet on Imawildandcrazyguy, a cold exacta punch with him underneath Curlin, and some tris and supers with Curlin on top, Imawildandcrazyguy in third and fourth and pretty much all of the others (especially Rags to Riches) filling in the other slots.
And after the bets are placed, I am going to hope that Jazil’s name is brought up after the race for more than just being Rags to Riches’s older brother.



















